Anthropocentrism and the argument from emotional ties

Authors

  • Oscar Horta

Abstract

Nonhuman animals are routinarily used as resources for us to use. An important argument in the literature on the issue claims that this is justified because we are not attached to them by the emotional ties that bind us to other human beings. This line of reasoning is examined here and found to be faulty as regards both its factual and its normative assumptions. This implies that the burden of proof rests on the side of those who want to defend the use of nonhuman animals. The paper concludes with the claim that until a sound defense of anthropocentrism is provided, we should assume that such use is not morally justified.

Author Biography

Oscar Horta

Departamento de Filosofía
Rutgers University

Published

2009-09-30

How to Cite

Horta, O. (2009). Anthropocentrism and the argument from emotional ties. Dilemata, (1), 1–13. Retrieved from https://dilemata.net/revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/1