To livewith others and/or to live for others? Autonomy, bonds and feminist ethics
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the ethical possibility of rethinking the role of care and human bonds outside a patriarchal framework. First of all, I revise some philosophical understandings of friendship that havemaintained that women were incapable of it. Equality and symmetry were the requirements for friendship and the subordinated status of women in history was the fact that had made impossible for them to aspire to the moral excellence of philía. Secondly, I analyze the gender subtext of the idea of autonomy to show that have been constructed by masculine patterns, specially, when it dismiss the constitutive fact of human interdependence. Finally, I focus on the last contributions of feminist bioethics to reflect about the need of conceiving autonomy in a framework of relationships and mutual obligations of care. This opens the possibility of recovering a new sense of a autonomy , that is coherent with the moral experience of women, focused on care, and this relational autonomy seems to me a essential point of depart to rethinkmany of the current bioethical debates.Downloads
Published
2009-09-30
How to Cite
Guerra Palmero, M. J. (2009). To livewith others and/or to live for others? Autonomy, bonds and feminist ethics. Dilemata, (1), 71–83. Retrieved from https://dilemata.net/revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/6
Issue
Section
Articles
License
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are licensed under a “Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial 3.0 Spain” (CC-by-nc).